JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 2, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo

✓Claimant Resguardo D Ela Alta Y Media Guajira Del Municipio De Uribia Y Otro

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Aclaración Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Rechazar por falta de legitimación
  • Rechazar por extemporánea
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitudes de aclaración de la sentencia T-155/15, formuladas por el Resguardo de la Alta y Media Guajira del municipio de Uribia y por la Dirección de Asuntos Indígenas, Rom y Minorías del Ministerio del Interior.

Luego de analizar cada una de las peticiones la Sala de Revisión decide RECHAZARLAS.

La primera, por falta de legitimación, y la segunda, por extemporánea.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (12 points)
  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por extemporánea la solicitud de aclaración de la sentencia T-155 del 14 de abril de 2015, presentada por la Dirección de Asuntos Indígenas, Rom y Minorías del Ministerio del Interior el 10 de mayo de 2016.
  2. Segundo. NOTIFICAR a los peticionarios.
  3. Tercero. Contra la presente providencia no procede recurso alguno.
  4. ALEJANDRO LINARES CANTILLO
  5. Magistrado
  6. GABRIEL EDUARDO MENDOZA MARTELO
  7. Magistrado
  8. GLORIA STELLA ORTIZ DELGADO
  9. Magistrada
  10. MARTHA VICTORIA SÁCHICA MÉNDEZ
  11. Secretaria General
  12. 1 De acuerdo con el sistema de control de términos de la
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo
Magistrado
✓
Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 0cited by 3 →A. 235/16A. 1014/242024A. 1272/242024T-288A/162016
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by3

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.